top of page
  • emnzr

An Astounding 91 Clinical Research Studies ALL CONFIRMED That NATURAL IMMUNITY Provides Same, If Not

An Astounding 91 Clinical Research Studies ALL CONFIRMED That NATURAL IMMUNITY Provides Same, If Not Better Protection Against the Virus Than Covid-19 Vaccines

Infection Rate Remained at “Almost ZERO” Among Previously Infected Individuals


By Julian Conradson thegatewaypundit.com Published October 26, 2021 at 7:20pm

he verdict is in.


As has been the case for the past 100 years of modern medicine, natural immunity has – once again – been affirmed to provide more complete and longer-lasting immunity than lab-created vaccines.


This week, the Brownstone Institute for Social and Economic Research published a list of 91 different clinical research studies which each conclude that naturally acquired immunity is at the very least equal to, but in many cases vastly superior, to the experimental mRNA vaccines that are currently available. Every single one of the studies was conducted over the past year and a half and specifically analyzed natural immunity in relation to the Covid-19 outbreak that originated in China.


The results are shocking. In just one study that looked at “52,238 employees in an American healthcare system,” researchers found that the reinfection rate among individuals who had recovered from Covid-19, even if they had gone on to get the vaccine after recovering, was “almost zero.”


Most notably, of the almost 1,400 “previously infected subjects” who had never received a Covid-19 vaccine, not a single one was reinfected with the virus. The data was so clear that researchers concluded vaccination is “unlikely to benefit” individuals with natural immunity.


According to “Necessity of COVID-19 vaccination in previously infected individuals,” published on June 5th, 2021:


“Cumulative incidence of COVID-19 was examined among 52,238 employees in an American healthcare system. The cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection remained almost zero among previously infected unvaccinated subjects, previously infected subjects who were vaccinated, and previously uninfected subjects who were vaccinated, compared with a steady increase in cumulative incidence among previously uninfected subjects who remained unvaccinated.

Not one of the 1359 previously infected subjects who remained unvaccinated had a SARS-CoV-2 infection over the duration of the study. Individuals who have had SARS-CoV-2 infection are unlikely to benefit from COVID-19 vaccination…”

The results are backed up by all 91 of the other studies in some way or another. In addition to thoroughly demonstrating the efficacy of natural immunity, several of the studies also provided other shocking revelations. Some of the most notable findings include:

From SARS-CoV-2 re-infection risk in Austria, Pub, 2021:

“Protection against SARS-CoV-2 after natural infection is comparable with the highest available estimates on vaccine efficacies.

Additionally, hospitalization in only five out of 14,840 (0.03%) people and death in one out of 14,840 (0.01%) (tentative re-infection).”

In other words, this study found that individuals who had natural immunity have a 99.99% chance of not dying, and a 99.97% chance of having a mild case that does not require hospitalization – so much for the vaccine’s 90-95% efficacy rate for those two grim measurements.

From Persistence of neutralizing antibodies a year after SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans, Pub, 2021

“Assessed the persistence of serum antibodies following WT SARS-CoV-2 infection at 8 and 13 months after diagnosis in 367 individuals…found that NAb against the WT virus persisted in 89% and S-IgG in 97% of subjects for at least 13 months after infection.”


In case there was any doubt that natural immunity also provides long-lasting protection, this study demonstrates how 89-97% of subjects still had antibodies for ‘at least’ 13 months after their initial Covid diagnosis. Contrast that with the vaccine, which has been proven to provide less and less antibodies as time progresses – Why else would you need perpetual booster shots?


And finally, from “Protection of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection is similar to that of BNT162b2 vaccine protection: A three-month nationwide experience from Israel,” Pub, 2021


“The overall estimated level of protection from prior SARS-CoV-2 infection for documented infection is 94·8% (CI: [94·4, 95·1]); hospitalization 94·1% (CI: [91·9, 95·7]); and severe illness 96·4% (CI: [92·5, 98·3])…results question the need to vaccinate previously-infected individuals.”


This study that analyzed the ‘entire population’ of Israel – one of the most vaccinated countries in the world – also demonstrates the robust protection against severe cases of Covid that comes along with natural immunity. Researchers found that vaccines actually provided LESS protection, albeit slightly, against spreading the virus (92.8% for vaccine compared to 94.8 for natural) and severe illness (94.4% vaccine vs. 96.4% natural).


These findings were also backed up by a separate study out of Israel that showed how vaccinated individuals are 13x more likely to have a breakthrough infection and more likely to be hospitalized when compared to those who had already recovered from the virus.


These findings were also backed up by a separate study out of Israel that showed how vaccinated individuals are 13x more likely to have a breakthrough infection and more likely to be hospitalized when compared to those who had already recovered from the virus.


New Israeli Study Finds Fully Vaccinated People are at “Greater Risk of Hospitalization” and 13 TIMES MORE LIKELY to Catch Covid-19 Than Those Who Have Recovered and Have Natural Immunity



12 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All
bottom of page